|
AlienMind
The Verdants
A Hyperversal
Problem Case
Some hyper-advanced aliens and their hybrids occasionally try to
blot out, or still and evacuate a certain thought that I may be
about to either act upon or elaborate for others. In order to avert
the thought, or sometimes just to conspicuously demonstrate the
ability to obstruct or thwart the memory, they do so. This can be
frustrating: you know they’re doing it (they even resonate about
it), yet at the moment you can’t recall a key aspect of what you
were just thinking. The problem, of course, is that they may do this
to themselves, essentially evacuating their own concerns and
feelings about certain subjects (a smoothing over of contrary
thoughts).
* They may think it more competitive, in a sense. Imagine
a society that does so…
For example, the most visible of the “three ellipticals”
hyperversals now finds himself facing a rising chorus of objections
about the IFSP’s manipulation of conflicts, here, because IFSP
direct operatives have committed crimes against humanity. And what’s
his response? He says that will spur humankind to evolve. Then, when
we say this can be done less destructively, he says the burden is on
us. When we reply that Verdants clearly seek resources here, he
tends to go quiet, as though he already did his thinking on the
subject.
A higher-ranking commanding officer
often appears in conjunction with this "three ellipticals" hyperversal
--- both try to be conspicuous about their sense of rank,
yet both betray a kind of insecurity in doing so. The insecurity
relates to their fear that humans will seek other affiliations and
will evolve independently. Meanwhile, at one juncture in 2006, a
more open-minded hyperversal explicitly admitted that Verdants get
resources in exchange for their efforts, an incentive for their
interventions. In other words, to some extent, the three ellipticals
faction agrees with the Verdant strategy. But why? All evidence
suggests that they, themselves, were once an expansive
mega-population like the Verdants.
The question of sexuality arises in discussions with a “three
ellipticals” hyperversal (he has a partly supervisory, partly
attending role in the situation here). He says Verdants help change
sexuals into non-sexuals, but when the subject came up in October of
2006, one of his subordinate aliens asked where, among the IFSP’s
populations, do you see sexuals? I pointed out the reported
500,000,000,000,000 Verdants, who are 3.3 times as numerous as other
IFSP aliens.
In other words, the subordinate was so wrapped up in the rationale
for IFSP expansion that he forgot that Verdant impulses and
behaviors are sexual. Admittedly, Verdants are a second stage of
sexuality, yet they’re famous for disproportionality and a desire to
exploit lesser aliens. Meanwhile, in order to smooth it all over,
the attending “three ellipticals” hyperversal simply evacuates his
own thoughts on the subject (he’s reportedly non-sexual).
* Some of
his population is probably sexual in order to preserve genetic
hardiness and alternatives. However, given the propagandistic nature
of “three ellipticals” subculture, it’s hard to imagine them
admitting to what we might regard as weaknesses.
What do more advanced aliens have to say about this? Sometimes
greater perspective comes together in a larger, finer context. Our
fractional nature in the universe leads to humbling, sometimes
awkwardly discomforting realizations. There are moments of
scientific acuity when we see it all from aside (alt. all around) in
naked, bare bones terms laced with contradictions and existential
discomfort.
At one such juncture in the summer of
2006, a different hyperversal showed a graphic, visual
representation of the attending “three ellipticals” hyperversal in
order to demonstrate a relationship to the Verdants. The “three
ellipticals” hyperversal’s eye structure was like that of the
Verdants, as was the general shape of his skullcase. He seemed to
have a slightly larger brain, in relation to his eyes, and some of
his other features are subtler than are those of a Verdant. His
physique appeared to be slightly more sturdy.
It was all quite revealing: we could see the case for his group
having genetically contributed to the Verdants in the past. This was
affirmed by other hyperversals, hence there’s at least some evidence
suggesting that the “three ellipticals” faction had a direct genetic
role in Verdant history. With this in mind, having heard that “less
than .01 percent” of Andromeda (less than 1/10,000th) is IFSP, we
have reason to think that the “three ellipticals’” project in
question may be less significant than they pretend it to be.
The
three elliptical galaxies in question may end up being,
-
Centaurus A
-
N5102 (a small elliptical near Centaurus A that’s 1/5 the apparent
size of the Andromeda galaxy)
-
perhaps another small elliptical,
rather than the larger, merged Milky Way-Andromeda elliptical-to-be
So, the question arises: Is an ongoing, consanguine relationship the
reason why the given “three ellipticals” hyperversal puts the IFSP’s
human casualties out of mind so neatly? It may be why he evacuates
his own feelings on the subject, which could handicap his judgment
(a smoothing over of contrary thoughts). If, as was stated, his
population had a guiding genetic role in Verdant history, then there
are material and resource motives in his posture. His faction may be
incapable of seeing beyond them. Again we’re reminded that they are
both fallible and of animal origin.
Is our planet now the target of an interbred alien expansion scheme?
If such is the case, it increases the likelihood that neighboring
aliens see the IFSP presence in our vicinity as unwelcome and
inherently undemocratic. And if that’s true, then there’s reason to
think that the IFSP intervention here can be warded off, as some
aliens suggest we need to do in order to preserve the Milky Way
ecology.
One easily overlooked danger of an intervention, here, by IFSP
aliens is that some humans may think it provides an excuse to ignore
a larger, universally-enforced ban on the use of negative-cycle
weapons in space. Although some may say that
scalar weapons are
needed to defend against the IFSP, there are fail-safe constraints
on the use of such weapons in this galaxy. On February 14, 2007 one
or more hyperversal alien(s) suggested that planets that ignored
such constraints have perished in this galaxy.
Meanwhile, Verdants take crude advantage
of the weapons prohibition by using it as an excuse to trip their
human operatives toward destructive, potentially planet-killing
excess. By tilting the human economy toward greed and secrecy (via
Rothschild,
Du Pont and cohorts), they frustrate resolution of human
conflicts. And how do such operatives affect the human economy? The
French Rothschild is an owner of
the Federal Reserve Bank, which
issues all US money (his grandparents and a
Rockefeller betrayed
tradition established by Andrew Jackson, who dissolved the
Rothschild-dominated Second Bank of the United States, which Jackson
thought was a royalist threat to the nation’s future because it had
a monopoly on issuing US money).
Due to a bias in favor of material gain, Verdants have made mistakes
that jeopardize their status here. For example: their bizarrely
overgrown population, the planet-killing failure of their last
intervention (the gray planet), the IFSP/grays’ reported use of
scalar weapons to kill dozens of US guards while freeing captive
grays from an underground US facility, and the materially-motivated
scramble of the IFSP’s direct operatives (who are implicated in
weapons propagation, crimes against humanity, and the worst
organized crime money laundering on Earth) --- all such behaviors
throw the Verdant rationale about weapons into doubt. As a result,
in inter-alien discussions, here, questions arise about how
surrounding populations must respond to Verdant expansion.
After two years of often unwelcome interactions with the “three
ellipticals” faction and its
–X3 subordinates, their behavior can be
outlined more neatly. The three ellipticals faction is too closely
tied to Verdants, which corrupts their perspective. The behavior of
“three ellipticals” hyperversals suggests that they, themselves,
were once an oversized offender like the Verdants, which may explain
their inability to think in ways that non-IFSP aliens consider
necessary.
Over time, the most disturbing aspect of “three ellipticals” faction
behavior has been their nauseatingly quick impulse to try to cut off
independent thinking. They try to pre-empt human contact with
independent, critical aliens. They seem to fear that independent,
critical thinking by humans will lead to the conclusion that the
“three ellipticals” faction and Verdants committed unnecessary crimes
against humanity (hence their mendacious propaganda, which, for me,
has been nightmarish). Given the exploitative, sometimes destructive
nature of the Verdant empire, some humans are now discreetly
exploring preliminary relations with native neighbors rather than
the token IFSP enclaves hastily assembled near us by Verdants (i.e.
“Pleiadians” who include Semitics and Nordics; gray variants; tall
whites, and such).
While humans explore contacts with alternative networks of less
offensive neighbors, “three ellipticals” and IFSP aliens try to
avert such contacts by resorting to petty, often infantile routines
and diversions. Ironically, the diversions are framed in a
low-order, often low cultural character---attempts to debase good
human thought by intruding with run-on, nauseating routines (often
framed in terms of the worst of human pop culture or the lies and
fears of corrupt human subcultures). This is yet another example of
the mind-destructive impulses of frustrated aliens.
Over time, the diversionary behaviors of “three ellipticals”
hyperversals have become so ridiculous that some humans see a need
to make a clean break with them. On the one hand, it’s obvious that
the “three ellipticals” faction may not be up to compelling a change
in Verdant behavior, while on the other hand, they seem to be
incapable of admitting that such is the case. Their propaganda is
too singular, and many of their various dependents appear to lack
basic critical thinking skills.
The inadequacies of the three ellipticals faction are so stark and
unmistakable that humans and other alien observers are now compelled
to seek larger comparison. At present, it appears that the three
ellipticals faction may be an opportunistic basket case. They try to
say that they aren’t on our map (when referring to our map of the
visible universe), but the assertion appears to be deflectory and
partly false.
We know that their physics and their way
of communicating and configuring their large, artificial craft
models the universe as being more condensed and less spacious than a
typical human might imagine (hyperversals network more quickly than
other aliens), but hyperversals certainly don’t live without
reference to our visible map of the universe. In other words, for
reasons of pride and insular distinction, the “three ellipticals”
faction prefers to act as though they are independent of nearly all
that we see.
It’s a contradictory assertion. They resort to nightmarish extremes
of propaganda and diversion in order to discourage us from
assimilating with “independent” aliens, yet the three ellipticals
faction tries to act as though they, themselves, are independent of
our map of the visible universe. It simply doesn’t add up. Again, a
competing hyperversal said that one of the “three ellipticals”
hyperversals left “his retirement garden” in Centaurus A, a clearly
visible galaxy.
“Three ellipticals” and IFSP offenders force us to look deeper into
Virgo and elsewhere for better example. From the perspective of
other hyperversals and aliens tasked with more challenging galaxy
mergers deep within Virgo, the relatively quick screw-up of the
“three ellipticals” faction way out here on Virgo’s fringes may look
bad. In the short space of 150-200 million years, the three
ellipticals faction allowed Verdants to exceed normal population
limits by a factor of some 5 to 10-fold.
This calls into question the “three
ellipticals”’ ability to be responsible for the more turbulent, yet
urbane dynamics of deeper Virgo neighborhoods. Meanwhile, Centaurus
A, the focus of the “three ellipticals’” claim to fame, is a
relatively small galaxy when compared to larger ellipticals within
Virgo. Centaurus A formed more slowly, and the next big galaxy
merger in its vicinity may be that of the Milky Way with
Andromeda---some 3.5 billion years hence.
In other words, even if we allow for
absorption of another spiral into Centaurus A during the next 3.5
billion years, the Centaurus A neighborhood is relatively tranquil
and should be fairly easy to tend to. Nonetheless, Verdants are far
beyond safe limits. Their planet-killing tendency to exploit other
aliens poses a threat to surrounding galaxies. Worse yet, the IFSP
is an empire controlled by sexuals, not a collective.
On a larger scale, the “three ellipticals” pretenders may be
regarded as backward upstarts out near the edge of a modest-sized
supercluster. Whether they’re regarded as failure-prone or not, the
consequences of having allowed Verdants to become so extreme, so
quickly, may be that the “three ellipticals” routine poses a threat
to the consensus among Virgo’s hyperversals. If the “three
ellipticals” faction was once a Verdant-like problem case, Virgo’s hyperversals may worry that it might seek divergent alliances for
strategic purposes, rather than integrate into an effectively
counter-balanced interaction between galaxy superclusters.
By failing to control the Verdants,
“three ellipticals” hyperversals have isolated themselves, perhaps
assuring that other hyperversal regimes won’t separately affiliate
with them. In other words, there are tensions between hyperversals,
also.
|