|
AlienMind
The Verdants
When the Cosmic-scale Meets the Micro-scale
10-27-2005
So, what is this new “electrogravity” that can either make or break
the future of an entire planet? First off, it isn’t new. It’s part
of the fundamental basis for many phenomena in our daily lives.
Secondly, it frames many alien thought processes in much the same
way that light and electricity frame human thought processes. One
note of caution: some hyper-advanced aliens may have exceeded the
notion of electrogravity by defining their existence in terms of yet
deeper alternative cycles, not just the negative cycle that defines
electrogravity. By doing so, they will have made their minds and
technology sensitive to multiversal dynamics—which most humans
wouldn’t understand, at this point.
For a more basic understanding of electrogravity, we turn to retired
Navy Col. Tom Bearden. Tom Bearden is an engineer, a friendly,
bearded older gentleman who has written about his various encounters
with electrogravity technology during his career. Here’s Bearden’s
quick summary of electrogravity:
When light waves converge along
three different axes so that opposing light waves cancel each other
out, they bleed into electrogravity. Simple isn’t it?
Let’s re-state the idea, just to be clear. Remember the x, y, and z
axes of those point-coordinate graphs that you did in high school?
Bearden says that when two different light waves snake toward each
other from opposite directions along each of three axes so that the
rolling hump in each light wave exactly mirrors and cancels out the
opposing light wave along each axis, the energy “bleeds into electrogravity.” All you have to do, says
Bearden, is vary the
energy potential in such a convergence to produce electrogravity.
*Author’s note: you would have to capture the energy with another
device and would have to condition the environment to prevent
uncontrolled damage of a larger sort.
Remember how your high school science teacher said that, when light
waves cancel each other out, they disappear? It’s called
“destructive interference.” That’s what Bearden is talking about.
Bearden says that if we do it right, the energy bleeds into an extra
dimension (as electrogravity). Bearden isn’t the only one who says
this. In the Jan. 2000 issue of Scientific American is an article on
“negative energy” by physicists Lawrence H. Ford and Thomas A.
Roman.
Both are physics PhD’s: Ford was taught by
John Archibald
Wheeler, and Roman was taught by a co-author and contemporary of
Einstein. In the article, Ford and Roman write that scientists can
now converge lasers in a vacuum, which causes “squeezed-state
fluctuations in the vacuum of space-time” (places where light waves
cancel out and squeeze, or compress, space-time). Such fluctuations
involve “negative energy,” places where the energy level is actually
“less than zero.” So, how can energy be less than zero? Easy, says
Bearden: it bleeds into extra dimension—as electrogravity.
But that’s not all. Bearden says the converse is also true:
Destructive interference of electrogravity bleeds back into
electromagnetism (light waves). Bearden says that the relationship
between electromagnetism (light) and electrogravity is reciprocal,
like two fractions that are upside-down reciprocals of each other.
If all of this sounds confusing, try to visualize light waves
snaking toward each other, then read the last four paragraphs above
again. Electrogravity tucks the converging energy down into rapidly
fluctuating, multiple places, in a sense. It goes deeper.
Aliens suggest that when we produce electrogravity it bleeds into
the larger space-time— where it does a neat little trick. As Bearden
says, electrogravity can actually speed the flow of time in precise,
measured amounts throughout that same section of space-time. Bearden
goes so far as to re-state Einstein’s famous equation as E=Δt c2 In
other words, Bearden says that mass is equivalent to Δt, the change
in time. Sounds relatively innocuous, doesn’t it?
Think again. What Bearden is saying, and what aliens have repeatedly
confirmed in explicit communications, is that electrogravity can
speed the flow of time, perhaps even allowing for a kind of
fluctuation into past time (not concretely, we presume). So, what
does that mean? It means that electrogravity isn’t “free.” It comes
at a cost because it speeds the flow of time, ever so slightly
shortening the life of the surrounding continuum. This means that a
reckless overuse of electrogravity could conceivably shorten the
life of our sun, for example. Some of those “gray” aliens that you
may have read about have reported that their original planet was
rendered uninhabitable by a large-scale misuse of electrogravity.
So, there are both risks and a larger kind of ecology surrounding
the use of electrogravity. It needs to be globally regulated. We
need to do so within a better international legal framework, i.e.
the World Court, and more. Weapons and greed are no excuse for
failing to do so because electrogravity is essentially about human
(and other) commonality. *A mono-polar US corporate empire is no
solution, in such regard. Instead, it will breed deep global
resentment, which may set the stage for more intelligent global
alternatives.
Depending on the perspective, there’s a risk that some
aliens now see the US as just another, low-order nightmare, to be
driven toward a transforming crisis—as was Nazi Germany. This has
been noted in numerous alien communications on such subjects. It’s
more of an issue than most people realize. The big question is: who
will control what remains of this planet’s resources, humans or the
abducting alien aggregation? In the latter case, human freedoms
would be sharply compromised.
Aliens further suggest that Δt effects of electrogravity must be
moderated by countervailing negative energy dynamics. In other
words, to prevent uncontrolled damage to the environment,
electrogravity must be used sparingly. Aliens suggest that it be
used only where necessary, in conjunction with conventional,
long-term energy technologies such as solar, and other alternatives.
Apparently, the least harmful uses of electrogravity are
microgravitic—tiny quantum scale uses of a limited sort, i.e. for
medical and research purposes (maybe some limited travel in space).
It’s best when such uses are finely interconnected and balanced.
To
aliens, humans who use electrogravity too crudely look like cavemen
trying to lick a live high-voltage wire, when, instead, we need to
use it more like we use micro-electronics (finely interconnected
systems that need not disturb the global ecology). Failure to
achieve a more peaceful, sharing world order could be our doom
because aliens go out of their way to “condemn” the misuse of
electrogravity for aggressive weapons purposes.
Some readers are probably thinking, Now, wait a minute: if you use
electrogravity to speed up the flow of time in one place, wouldn’t
it slow time down somewhere else? This appears to be the case.
Within the focus of electrogravity, time appears to slow down,
although at a sum total cost to the universe’s energy lifetime. On
the other hand, if we can speed the flow of time, we could use electrogravity to speed the clock on radioactive wastes in order to
make them harmless. An advanced use of electrogravity could run the
clock on dangerous radioactive isotopes and clear them from the
environment and the human body.
If you’re still confused, let me offer some easy, visual ways of
thinking about negative energy and electrogravity. Much as you
learned in high school, there’s a larger conservation within the
universe. You just can’t get something for nothing. Although the
universe has expanded ever since the beginning (and continues to do
so), some of the universe is either slowly condensing together
(fusion) in stars, or disappearing inward—into black holes. In other
words, as space expands, part of the universe is cycling into denser
and denser forms—which provide a fundamental underlying basis for
all “condensed-state physics,” i.e. electrogravity. The new
condensed-state physics (lasers, Bose Einstein condensates, dark
states, dark energy and black holes) are at the cutting edge of 21st
century science. They will probably provide the basis for the most
important scientific breakthroughs of our time.
As Steven Hawking writes, the sum total positive energy of this
universe (seen in matter and the outward movement of energy) is
exactly equal to the total negative energy, the inward pull of
gravity. In short, the very existence of outward-flowing energy in
seemingly empty space is somehow premised on the simultaneous inward
pull of negative energy like gravity. For example, almost all of the
light that we see is due to the inward pull of gravity in stars that
fuse matter into denser and denser elements. It’s happening all the
time, and it’s all premised on the negative energy of a star’s
gravity. *It can’t be modeled solely in terms of what we see now,
but must be modeled in terms of the entire “lifetime” of the
universe, some of which remains hidden from us, of course.
Now, let’s pretend we’re aliens for a moment. If we were to produce
electrogravity in order to literally pull two distant points (or
circles/spheres) of space-time together for faster-than-light space
travel (as government whistle-blower Bob Lazar says aliens actually
do), we would borrow so incredibly much energy from the surrounding
space-time that we would ever-so-slightly speed the flow of time
there. And, if you speed the flow of time anywhere, you
ever-so-slightly shorten the energy lifetime of this universe, which
could be cause for concern off-world.
If you still don’t get the idea…
Here’s another easy way to visualize electrogravity:
Light waves are
like the waves in a small pond. Throw a stone into the pond and,
long before the waves begin to move outward in concentric circles,
the determining change of energy (the hurled stone) has hit the
water. As it sinks, due to gravity, waves spread on the water’s
surface. Negative energy and deeper-dimensional fluctuations are
like the stone. They happen on a deeper level, due to a kind of
gravity, but we see only the waves on the surface.
(If you “see” in
negative energy terms, you see in the dark, so to speak---in one
most ironic sense it would be like the darkened inner vision of your
mind).
Like the stone sinking into the pond, deeper dimensional
events accompany every light wave. They connect to a larger,
universal quantity because each change of energy runs the universal
clock toward some end(s), due to a universal conservation of sorts.
If you actually watch the stone go into the pond, you hear the sound
of the splash, and, in a larger configuration space (an orb-like
space surrounding the whole pond and its environs), a nearly instant
change of energy occurs when the stone is attracted by gravity. That
inward pull of gravity, countered by outward wave reverberations, is
like the larger universe’s energy condition. The universe cycles
into black holes and constantly cycles into heavier, denser elements
in stars (a kind of negative energy in each case). Meanwhile, those
deeper cycles reverberate in the “empty space” all around. So, in
order to see the event as it truly is, you need to model gravity in
universal terms (the stone goes into the pond, running the universal
clock ever so slightly), plus you see the event by the sun’s light
(caused by a fusion-cycling of matter into denser states) and you
hear the sound, then see the surface waves on the water.
In a sense, light waves are like the waves on the pond’s surface.
Meanwhile greater, cosmic quantities affect the scene in such a big
way, overall, that they are nearly instantaneous: universal gravity,
negative energy fluctuations in empty space all around plus in a
universal clock-of-sorts that allows us to even see in the first
place—due to a kind of energy condition throughout the universe.
Here’s another visual metaphor that demonstrates electrogravity.
Imagine the universe as being a balloon. Blow the balloon up, then
use a brown felt-tipped pen to draw spots on opposite ends of the
balloon. Now, squeeze the center of the balloon together between two
fingers. In a sense, all atoms and quanta are like the balloon: when
you converge light waves together to bounce electrogravity out of
atoms-and-space collectively, you also “squeeze” the universe
together inside the atoms’ nuclei, which causes time to flow faster
in the rest of the universe (the brown spots on the balloon that
speed away from each other).
If you think it through carefully, electrogravity is easy to
understand. Alien children are introduced to the basics early
because, if they don’t think in universal terms, they will neither
comprehend the nature of their technology, nor the effect that their
technology has on the larger universe. If they don’t understand how
big-connects-to-small via alternative “cycles” like negative energy,
they won’t understand that a selfish misuse of electrogravity
violates the larger universal ecology.
Here’s another easy metaphor reportedly suggested by a crew of
“gray” aliens:
Imagine that under every light wave is a negative
energy fluctuation, like a little black hole—a dark spot tucked
under the snaking crest of every light wave.
That’s negative energy,
but remember: it both tucks into, and cycles faster-than-light
through both the beginning point where the light wave began, and the
end point where the light is later absorbed into another atom. How
can it do that?
It can do so if gravity is slightly faster-than-light because
gravity is coming and going from so many directions all around
(inside the nucleus of every single atom, plus in every condensed,
or “squeezed-state,” object) on a larger universal scale. It’s
almost as though gravity involves a seemingly backward direction in
time, which isn’t really backward, but is, instead, a summed-up
variety of larger, long-term relationships. Those long-term
relationships are always there, everywhere you go, but wow---they
are so tightly stitched into the structure of space-time! It’s as
though the bizarrely tight fluctuations within a black hole can
instantly leap through a great many of those more normal (“white
hole”) light waves that we see all around us (but that leap isn’t
linear; it’s multi-directional).
So, in a sense, light waves would be like small ripples on the
surface of a big ocean, when compared to the nearly instant tuck of
energy and gravity into (or non-locally through) the nucleus of
every atom---which is instantaneous in one basic respect: the sum
total mass and gravity (negative energy) is measured only on a
universal scale, i.e. how much of it fuses together in stars or goes
into black holes and is thus lost to our view for the rest of time.
It literally clocks the universe.
And just what is that dark spot we imagine under the snaking crest
of every light wave? Think of it as empty space that’s teeming with
bizarre, wormhole-like fluctuations that don’t noticeably connect in
a weird far-away manner unless you do what Tom Bearden says---you
converge and cancel out light waves and vary the potential, which
bleeds into electrogravity (extra dimension), then you focus the
electrogravity on distant coordinates in space. To do so creates an
effect that’s like going through a wormhole because you pull two
seemingly distant coordinates in space-time together so fast that
it’s as though all the empty space in between was left standing
still, in comparison (really it’s just stretching and speeding the
clock a little). You move beyond the intervening space-time by
entering a denser and faster, yet more universally-timed and hugely
non-local dimension. It’s as though you went through a black hole
faster-than-light---you took a shortcut through deeper dimensions.
Aliens further suggest that there’s a critical irony in doing so.
Believe it or not, some aliens suggest that you don’t actually “go”
as such. Instead, you simply re-dimension within a different sum of
perspectives. By doing so, you will have changed yourself and your
awareness. Thereafter, if you think about it, you will live within a
different kind of universe.
Your mind’s concepts and your interactions will be different,
considerably more intelligent (we
all hope). As such, you will be transitioning into a universe of
hyper-condensed, collective
identities—a higher kind of mindedness. Act accordingly, say various
aliens: you’re merging
into a greater, yet finer kind of existence. There are (polite)
control
Here’s a much easier visual metaphor for electrogravity. Light waves
are normally modeled as if whole-numbered (one light wave here,
another one there, each distinct—as if a whole number 1 here,
another 1 there...). The truth is, they aren’t whole quantities.
Each wave is a bizarre kind of trick that shoots out of an atom’s
depths (where, ironically, we find a deeper kind of destructive
interference). Think of the atom as being frozen in time for an
almost unbelievably brief moment when a photon is emitted. At that
moment, the atom exists in a weird, otherworldly context alongside
black holes—the weirdest of “quanta.” (*In a sense, the singularity
in a black hole is a tiny particle with extra-dimensional tricks up
its sleeve.) When our atom is seen in that brief moment, with the
black hole in the not-so-distant background (not so distant because
the moment is so brief—which effectively shortens all distances),
the atom has fractional waveform/multiple connectedness to a black
hole singularity.
What’s “fractional waveform?” The answer is easy. Fractional
waveform is a wave that goes both forward and backward in time. For
example, the model that physicists use is that of a light wave or
photon that goes to its destination (a future “black-body”
absorber), then runs backward in time as a “half-wave” and
interferes with itself at its point of origin, causing the electron
that originally emitted the photon to recoil. In other words, an
electron that emits a photon recoils like a gun after a bullet
fires, but in the electron’s case the recoil is caused by a
fractional “half-wave” returning from a future “quantum absorber”
and interfering with its own past. Weird, isn’t it? Prize-winning
physicists Feynman and Wheeler are famous for fractional wave ideas.
The light wave is also conditioned by the original singularity from
which the universe emerged, and the light wave is further defined by
the seemingly-singular time intervals posed by any and every journey
that light takes. Somehow, light seems to know, beforehand, the
number of intervals (waves) it must divide into in order to be
absorbed by a future atom. Light does a similar trick in what are
called two-slit experiments. *In an alternative sense, that
backward-streaming “half-wave” can be modeled as not going backward
at all, but simply re-orienting within different cosmic conditions
(as they relate to the little electron and the light wave in a
weird, new kind of time).
Here’s another visual metaphor for electrogravity:
Those
multiply-connected “fractional waveforms” discussed above all relate
to greater, cosmic quantities. With our eyes, we can see light waves
(actually not the waves, but the general glow—one irony of being the
big, gooey bodies of liquid that we are), but if we could see
incredibly much faster, we would see the fractional waveforms
emerging from nowhere in empty space and causing weirdly stormy
fluctuations in all of the empty space around us---tiny, tiny goings
on, with black hole singularities just over there in the background
(again due to the fact that the moment is so incredibly brief, hence
the distances aren’t as important... the faster the moment, the
smaller is the universe.)
This agrees with Heisenberg’s uncertainty
principle, which says that high energy particles can appear out of
nowhere in empty space because they can “borrow” increasingly large
amounts of energy from “empty” space, provided that they then
disappear that much more rapidly.
In short, our new negative energy model provides a nice explanation
for how empty space can even exist, in the first place—as an irony
of our negative cycle. Apparently, seemingly empty space is but one
elusive result of the universe discretely cycling into itself
everywhere, through gravity—over great periods of time.
Without being a physicist, one can easily get a feel for it all.
Here’s another visual metaphor. Negative energy and electrogravity
are all like something that’s inside of you, but you never notice it
because your awareness is primarily in terms of much longer
intervals of time. If you could “see” in terms of those tiny, tiny
intervals of time (multiply-connected fractional waveform/negative
energy cycles) in which black holes and all atoms’ nuclei interact,
you’d literally feel electrogravity. You’d probably think that
electrogravity framed the only valid outlook, not that weirdly
distant, slower-moving “light” stuff. *Of course, I’m simply posing
alternative perspective here.
Here’s a fun-filled mental exercise to help you get a better
intuitive feel for negative energy. Forget about tabletop objects
and concretes like your hand or a rock, and forget about outwardly
moving waves—for a day or two. Instead, think only in terms of deep
down inner space, a place where the distances between an atom’s
nucleus and its electrons and photons is huge—like the distance
between the sun and its relatively tiny planets.
Now, while you’re
thinking like that, remember---all of the universe is that way:
vast, seemingly empty spaces between atoms traversed by weird
fluctuations and strange interactions. Black holes can act on that
tiny micro-level where we define gravity. Stranger still, there’s an
even deeper kind of inner space that’s important in all that we see
around us. Some theorists think that, long ago, when the universe
first emerged from the bizarrely convoluted black hole(s) that seem
to have existed just before the “big bang” (or whatever we call the
original event from which we currently speed away), there was an
event called “inflation.”
Inflation would have been a bizarre process. According to the
inflation model, in less than a fraction of a second, the universe
expanded so far and so fast that both the speed and the distance are
difficult to comprehend. Why so difficult to comprehend? Because in
that tiny fraction of a second the universe went from an almost
immeasurably deep kind of inner space, and grew to the size of a
basketball. Again, an incredibly deep kind of inner space---a great
inner distance, which would relate in active, fractional ways to all
that we see around us.
If that sounds weird (it’s one of the leading theories at present),
then consider this: Before
inflation, even “space” was tucked inside of, or behind, the
original singularity (alt singularities)...
How could that be? It had to have been fluctuating in bizarrely
non-local ways, like our so-called “quantum cosmology,”
coincidentally. Clearly, empty space is more complex and enigmatic
than humans once thought it to be. To complete the picture,
scientists are now certain that seemingly “empty” space isn’t really
empty. Instead, it teems with particles and negative energy
fluctuations that appear, then disappear—faster than we can measure
them, individually. Nonetheless, some of the negative energy of
those elusive “virtual particles,” as they’re called, has actually
been measured in physics laboratories.
In short, we live in a universe that was originally premised upon,
and is now deeply integrated by, a newly discovered “negative
energy” dynamic. The science of negative energy further suggests
that despite the fact that black holes swallow all visible light,
black holes do, in fact communicate with each other. Black hole
singularities interact as both gravity and time barriers.
Meanwhile, within black holes the distances between former atoms is
almost nil, which, albeit cold and tiny, suggests alternative
dimensions of destructive interference. So, in the new “negative
energy” universe, black holes could conceivably act like
wormholes---if you were to approach them faster-than-light (you’d be
composed of strangely-distributed fractional waveform, not our
visible light waves, because you’d be going so darned fast...). Of
course, we now know that black holes are all just fractions of the
universal whole. If we “look” at them on the tiny quantum level
only, as in our “inner space” thought exercise, they probably make
more sense.
So, please, try thinking in terms of physics’ weirdly tiny phenomena
only---for a few days, not the familiar terms of relatively big
light waves and concretes... In the end, you’ll be asking yourself
which is tinier: the deeply-fluctuating non-local universe, or the
idea that our flatland life (locally-sensed concretes, a brief 78
year lifespan) is bigger and more definitive than it actually is?
*In one alternative to inflation theory, the universe would not have
been “contained” within but one tiny singularity, but would have
emerged from a more fuzzy multiplicity of singular conditions, i.e.
black holes, that could have communicated with each other via an
elusive new physics. Hence, if there were a sudden inflation
process, it could have emerged from a variety of fluctuations,
overall. Alternatively, as Stanford theorist Andre Linde has
postulated, inflation (s) may yet be occurring on a micro scale, to
this very day. If true, this might allow for a universe that
continually re-cycles, i.e. within a kind of multi-verse that can
regenerate, over time, through higher order processes. Indeed, every
bit of energy, every movement of atomic quanta may be due to a kind
of inflation that smears out and is shared by all quanta in a given
context---a basic, universal energy condition premised on a black
hole-white hole dynamic that ties large scale cosmic phenomenon to
small-scale quantum horizons (as does quantum cosmology, by the
way).
Further proof of how far science has gone in the basic direction of
Bearden’s model of destructive interference can be seen in Nobel
Prize winning experiments on what are called “Bose-Einstein
condensates.” Scientists do destructive interference (converging and
canceling out light waves) with lasers to cool photons and other
particles down to a temperature that is mere billionths of a degree
above absolute 0º Celsius, and, voila, the atoms do something weird.
They lose their separate identities and merge into a single
super-atom. Recently, in January 2004 scientists at the National
Institute of Standards in Boulder, CO announced that they did the
same with fermions, which are normal atoms (potassium in this case)
containing protons and neutrons.
In addition, using destructive
interference of light, researchers like Lene Hau at Harvard have
produced “dark states,” which can make light freeze to a stop—even
when one of the interfering beams is turned off! Research of the
sort may provide an explanation for what is known as “dark energy”
and “dark matter,” which cosmologists say may comprise more than 95
percent of the universe. So, scientists can see that Bearden is
definitely onto something re: converging and canceling out light
waves.
Supercomputers made of supercooled, condensed atoms may soon
revolutionize information density and efficiency. Moreover,
scientists recently slammed gold atoms together at nearly the speed
of light (extremely high energy—roughly 1 trillion degrees), which
caused the nuclei of the atoms to do something weird. They merged
into a kind of pudding, a plasma in which the protons, neutrons (and
the quarks and gluons inside such particles) lost their individual
identity and merged into a mysterious new form of matter. This could
easily involve destructive interference of high-energy waveform, a
kind of inward reverberation. More recently, experiments of the sort
have shown that a plasma of the sort can communicate changes across
itself, almost instantaneously!
For decades now, quantum physics has shown that an individual’s very
act of observation of a phenomenon has an effect on that phenomenon,
in basic quantum terms. A though minute, the effect is even more
pronounced when we model the phenomenon in terms of electrogravity.
In short, through a logical extension of such principles we can
assume that the couch potato anonymity of the 20th century, the
illusion of externality to any observation (or suffering people), is
no longer valid. It has no basis in science. This doesn’t mean we
can’t do experiments without being drawn into the test tube. It
simply means that, as Schrödinger’s cat and quantum physics
“two-slit experiments” suggest, part of the universal basis is both
drawn into, and marginally re-defined within any observation. Bearden’s Δt is but one example of how this can occur.
The observer’s terms of observation, the way in which an observation
is defined, are analogous to what, in mathematics, is known as
Gödel’s incompleteness theorem. The depth and breadth of an
observation are limited by the observer’s terms of observation, the
framework within which he/she measures and defines them. A
relativistic model will look for relativistic solutions, a quantum
(and negative energy) model will look for quantum and
negatively-cycled solutions. A multiversal model will look for
multiversal solutions. In the end, the best model combines all such
models and inter-dimensions/inter-cycles them accordingly.
Author’s note: The fact that we affect every act of observation
indirectly implies that long-term solutions to Earth’s problems are
being defeated by the displacement of the economically disadvantaged
from public awareness and political involvement, i.e. through the
destruction of long-term common resources for short-term elite
indulgence. In other words, the schlump who thinks he can simply
leech onto the underside of anonymous investments irrespective of
their ecological implications can’t hide from the ultimate
consequences. Negative energy dynamics loop all such doings back in
upon the offender, in some cases almost immediately. Those who might
think otherwise simply suffer a (consequently) diminished kind of
awareness. Aliens have suggested as much repeatedly, in some cases
out of frustration with their own governments.
So, how does this new paradigm affect me, for instance? Every
thought in my mind is a kind of observation—of my own past and of
various larger phenomena. Stranger still, the weirdness of quantum
and condensed-state physics (like electrogravity) suggests that we
need to question which is more valid: the individual’s observation
of order in the universe, or the larger universe’s “observation” of
the individual’s idea of order, in the first place? Which terms are
more valid?
If you don’t get physics...
If the physics jargon above sounds confusing to you, don’t worry...
Just remember this:
aliens see the universe as being strangely
elastic on a bizarrely deep down, inward sub-atomic level. That same
elasticity can be connected to form electrogravity, which literally
changes the flow of time. It allows for faster-than-light space
travel and other new dimensions in physics.
So, if aliens are
correct, a back-door kind of “negative cycle” allows for strange new
connections throughout the known universe. Other dimensions can
exist within your very head (or your head inside of them), in ways
that humans once thought impossible.
To help put some of this into perspective, here’s a quote from
Coevolution, a remarkably astute New Zealander’s report about being
taken away, fully awake, for a ten-day journey to a distant planet
inhabited by three-and-a-half to four foot tall aliens with large
dark eyes who call themselves “the Elders.” In the quotes below, a
female alien explains the Elder’s physics to the author,
Alec Newald:
“Suffice it to say that your very make-up, and the make-up of
everything you can see for that matter, is split into two cycles.
The negative or alternate one of these cycles is not known on Earth
except by a few, and most of them work for the military. This
negative cycle can defeat all the laws of physics as you know and
understand them, and this includes time travel....
“This concerns the cycle of the atom; the part that is still little
understood by your people, or, should I say, not yet fully
understood by them. When this is understood, a whole new dimension,
or dimensions, will open up for you—for in this instant of time
between the pulses of atoms lies a world within worlds. They are in
fact parallel dimensions to your own—at least to the one where most
of you live ‘now.’ These dimensions are so close to your real ‘now’
that you can slip in and out of them without even knowing you have
done so...
“You are very close to a major dimension-leap, the like of which you
have never before experienced... You see, you are not always where
you think you are. The trick is to be fully conscious when you make
these mini-leaps and be aware of where you have gone. You will be
very surprised, I think...
“Our (Elder) ancestors wanted to change from what you currently
understand as a three-dimensional hard-interface reality into the
fourth, or next higher dimension. The next reality is, in fact, only
slightly different from your own, but it is a softer, airier plane
where objects can intermix more easily. There is not so much of your
world’s hard-line boundaries, especially as far as body form is
concerned. Also, time can be stretched more easily in this domain.”
(from
Coevolution p. 20-22, 42-43, 56. Nexus Press)
|