by Gian J. Quasar
 

Disappearances have confounded and entranced people for thousands of years, from Enoch’s sudden disappearance to Ambrose Bierce’s popular 1880’s articles of people disappearing while simply walking in a field. But one thing is consistent within the stories, whether true or false— a vortex or funnel is often written in. For Bierce, these were invisible funnels within a prairie, or anywhere, into which an unsuspecting person walked and was held in a different time or space, though certainly Space-Time Warps were not even a part of scientific or popular vernacular in the 1880s. For Elijah, he was taken away in a “fiery whirlwind”—a vortex. For Ezekiel’s vision, whirlwinds turned within whirlwinds.

For the cynical these were only fanciful stories, and Bierce’s were Saturday afternoon mystery magazine pulp. But literature has an uncanny way of being prophetic. In the great scientific age of the 20th century, it was discovered that all matter is actually at a level of vortex kinesis, that is, swirling or spiraling motion. Whether it is the great galaxies, planets, suns, or the smallest atoms, all things rotate upon an axis and revolve around a core. The natural action of energy is vortex kinesis.
 

In this article we will probe into what the effects might be if nature or mankind intensified this action within matter. Can we disrupt the natural rhythm of matter? Can we affect time, matter and space by doing so? Let’s go on a journey through facts and potential.

With the 20th century there came mankind’s ability to support a thriving scientific culture. This allowed men of science to start contemplating such things as space-time warps. Perhaps they were urged to do so because of popular belief in such topics as expressed in Bierce’s Saturday afternoon pulp or in such popular occult stories as Oliver Lerch’s sudden vanishing.

The truth or falsehood of these stories is not important here. What is important is that they captured popular imagination, and perhaps made it acceptable for men of science to speak in serious terms about their possibility.

The most famous to give rational body to the idea of space-time warps was undoubtedly Dr. Albert Einstein. His own quote, one of my favorites, set the tenor for his modus operandi for scientific discovery:

“Science is merely the refinement of everyday thinking.”

Using his “Thought Experiments,” his scientific knowledge allowed him to temper and direct his imagination. Thus while other physicists came out of school with the same education he had, they went on to perform only the mechanics of physics, but not the artistry that Einstein would pioneer. In essence, he sat back and thought; he considered; he imagined. These were not flights of fancy; they were based on facts established and rational inference from observed data.

He imagined himself speeding in space, and came up with Relativity. He postulated that gravity was not a force at all, but a curvature of space around a massive body, like a planet, speeding through space. He further postulated that time was continuous with space.

An example may help us to understand. Two speeding cars pacing each other seem not to be moving at all to those inside each. But to a person standing on the side of the road, the cars zoom past at fantastic speed and are gone. But to those inside, life would remain the same; they would see the next car pacing them. It would be the same because they are being propelled at the same speed as the cars. Our planet is like one of those cars: it is being propelled in space, and us along with it.

The car can be considered in a progression of time as well. Move anywhere on that car and you are fine, or even jump to the next car. It is all right so long as you move to anything moving at the same progression. But try and step off that car while it is moving and you are left in the dust. The car speeds out of sight. Your world has gone. You are now in a different progression. You can’t get back until you accelerate fast enough to overtake that car.

Einstein postulated that a curvature of space would cause even light to bend through it— an electromagnetic wavelength that traditionally follows straight lines. Maverick idea. But in 1919 Sir Arthur Eddington detected a change in a star’s position during a total eclipse. Einstein seemed to be right: space was curving around the planet, and light was being bent. He was awarded his doctorate, which in part read cautiously “for adding significantly to the body of theoretical physics. . .” Relativity would not be mentioned, as nobody was sure what that was.

So it seemed space indeed was curving around masses in Space. If this was gravity or the result of gravity, no one is still sure. But if light were affected, it seemed too that other or all energy wavelengths might be affected. After all, light is only an electromagnetic wavelength. If light was curving, then it was slowing. Might the same be true of space? Then if time and space were continuous, might it then also be true of that greatest mystery—Time? Could we slow time by bending space?

The cornerstone of Einstein’s Relativity was, of course, E=MC², that is, energy equals mass times the speed of light squared. It is actually a simple equation, but its ramifications are monumental and universal. It means that there is an incredible amount of energy in any object, if we could just get at it in the nucleus of its atoms. If this could be verified, it would seem to mean that Relativity’s basic tenants of space and energy and time being continuous would be one step closer to fact.

It would be by the nuclear detonations at Alamogordo, New Mexico, July 16, 1945, that E=MC² would be proved. A chain reaction in the uranium atom caused the greatest explosion man had ever known. The atomic age had dawned.

As the space age dawned, further proof came of Einstein’s concept of the continuity of time and space. Atomic clocks placed at orbital heights recorded time passing just slightly faster than those at sea level. Where gravity, and hence a curvature of space, was greatest time moved more slowly; where it was not, more quickly. The passage of time as we record and experience it here was actually slower than in space.

Mass — such as this planet— did seem to bend space before it, and with this it did seem to slow time. Fractionally, granted. But it finally opened the labyrinth of time to logical conquest. Theoretically, it was proposed the greater the curvature of space, the greater time would be slowed. But if the Earth could only slow time fractionally by is massive size and speed through space, what “on earth” or anywhere else could bend space even more to significantly affect the progression of time?

Now, in the above examples of speeding cars obviously they cannot go fast enough to truly bend space and lock one into a different progression of time. But would it really require huge mass and speed to do it? The planet was indeed doing it slightly. But if time’s pathway lay along energy, could not bending or changing its electromagnetic frequencies also bring this about? There must be other methods to bend electromagnetic wavelengths.
 

Atomic Clue

We must first begin with the atom, any atom. There are only a little over 100 atoms in all the Universe that we know of. All that we see is built out of these and out of a combination of these. All atoms are made up of protons, electrons and neutrons, except hydrogen which has no neutron. No atom is different than the other except in number: Helium, Calcium, Titanium, Tin, whatever; they are all the same thing... except in number. They follow an orderly mathematical progression. Hydrogen, the simplest atom, has 1 proton in the nucleus and 1 electron in orbit. Helium has 2; 3 protons in the nucleus and 3 electrons in orbit is no longer a gas; it is Lithium, a silver-while metal. It goes on and on to Seaborgium, with 106 protons in the nucleus.

Therefore, the difference between all matter must be the electromagnetic energy created by the different number of these charged particles, not in the basic make up of these particles as individuals. The reason Nitrogen and Oxygen are such different gases cannot be that Nitrogen has 7 protons and 7 electrons and that Oxygen has 8 of each; it must be in the different amount of electromagnetic energy that one proton and one electron make that changes the substance.

The difference is not in the makeup of the particles, but in the space between the particles in orbit (electrons) and the nucleus (with protons). That space is the substance of everything. That space is electromagnetic energy. That space is “reality.” That space is the atom. Electromagnetism is the substance of everything. In essence, that “space” is the substance of all structure. That space is energy.

Understanding the structure of all matter is fundamental to understand the limitless potential of manipulating or warping electromagnetism, since by doing so you are capable of affecting the very energy that creates all things. This is far superior to the mere splitting of the nucleus of a complex atom. That only provides a violent form of energy. Within the electromagnetic force of the atom is the key to everything: creation, transmutation . . .limitless power.

Single atoms of five common elements: Hydrogen; Carbon; Nitrogen; Oxygen; and Iron. Not only does the varying number of protons in the nucleus and the varying number and system of orbits of electrons make one substance different from the other, the proximity of one type of atom to another creates an unlimited array of substance.

Water molecule H²O. In other words, 2 atoms of hydrogen and 1 atom of Oxygen. Two gases combine to make a liquid. It is not a material difference: the protons are still protons, the electrons still electrons. Electromagnetic energy has been affected by the proximity of these charged particles making up the atoms. A new substance is created.

To give you an idea of how universal are these substances and how limitless the potential of what they can create, here is an atomic formula: C₃₀₃₂ H₄₈₁₂ N₇₈₀ Fe₄ O₈₇₂ S₁₂

Do you know what this formula is? It is the most complex molecule known to man: the red blood cell. Put those many atoms of each substance—three thousand and thirty two atoms of carbon, four thousand eight hundred and twelve atoms of hydrogen, seven hundred and eighty atoms of nitrogen, four atoms of iron, eight hundred and seventy two atoms of oxygen, and twelve atoms of sulfur together in the right order and you have the most complex molecule we know of. It is something so tiny one needs a high powered microscope in order to see it. The speed with which the red blood cell carries out its complex functions is incredible. The complex data it carries is even more mindboggling. Its communication with the miniscule receptors in the bodily tissues is equivalent to writing the Gettysburg address on the point of a pin while passing that pin after being shot out of cannon.
 

Transmutation

Radioactive decay. The means by which one elements becomes another. The isotope Uranium 238 (92 protons and 146 neutrons in its nucleus) is unstable, meaning it sheds these particles from its nucleus. Doing so, the vital loss of these protons and neutrons changes it to another substance: a lesser complex one. In this decay chain Uranium changes eventually to common and stable Lead.

The loss of these particles obviously means the change in the electromagnetic force of the atom in question. Losing some of its 92 protons requires that it shed the equal number of electrons. It becomes a less complex atom eventually such as lead, where the process stops. Transmutation is the result of the electromagnetic energy changes that result. In this we can see the power contained in the electromagnetic forces that bind the atom, created by the various particles, their systems of orbit and their number.

Most substances, fortunately, aren’t like Uranium 238. They are stable and do not decay. But the example of radioactive decay shows us the power of changing the electromagnetic energy of any atom. If we could do so, then we could effectively carry on any form of transmutation we want.

This must be the basis behind the success of the Hutchison Effect. There can be no other proposal. To render items invisible, at other times transmute them from one substance to another, make objects levitate, burn white hot but not melt surrounding flammable material, or make things “cold melt,” fuse, or disappear, can only be because the atoms of that particular substance and the particular frequency each one has, was interrupted or warped, while the other substances, being on a different frequency (due to the different number of charged particles therein) were unaffected. This is limitless power . . .if harnessed repeatedly.

What potential exists within nature to create these electromagnetic changes or bend them in such a sense that it imitates bending of space? How intense does it need to be to cause something we today consider “supernatural” or impossible? Now we get to the Triangle of Bermudas and to the reports of electromagnetic anomalies and aberrations, disappearances, disintegrations— the crux of its infamous mystery. Are these indicators that electromagnetic aberrations are occurring for some unknown reason?

Underscoring the above is crucial to understanding a space warp.
 

Space Warp

The atom is often likened to a “mini solar system, most of it space.” It is always surprising to realize that this is true, that the structure of the atom is energy in a confined space between revolving charged particles. Since everything is made of atoms, everything in this Universe is mostly energy, not materially particulate. The electrons, protons and neutrons are only a small part of the atom. It is the space between them that is, ironically, the “substance.” Space in this case filled with electromagnetic energy.

Therefore all matter is not only mostly energy, but it is mostly space. This is hardly philosophy disguised as science. This is simple fact. In the above example of the red blood cell, we noted the number of each atoms. This translates to 102,408 charged particles making up the atoms of its structure. These same particles are what is in your computer key board, a wall, a car, rubber, anything. The red blood cell is different because of their arrangement. This creates the red blood cell. Remove the space from that red blood cell and no microscope will be able to detect those tiny particles.

It is the same for everything. Remove the space from it, and you have very little.

It is possible to estimate how many charged particles are in any given substance. Simply consider there are 30,000,000,000 red blood cells in the body. Mathematically, it is possible to determine how many electrons and protons and neutrons make up the blood. Add the volume of all tissues, of every atom from calcium to Iron, to whatever. It is beyond number probably. Take all the space out of the human body and all these charged particles would form a pile that is still so small it is invisible.

The same for a wall— if you know the volume of wood, plaster, etc., and you know the atoms that are the building block of these substances. You can then calculate how many charged particles are in an 8 x 10 wall. Remove the space from a wall and the combined particles might not even form a pellet the size of a small baby aspirin. In other words, take the space out of everything and what you have left isn’t much.

If all is mostly space, why can’t one substance pass freely through another? Go ahead and run to a wall. You wont go through. It’s been tried. It doesn’t work. It is not, however, a collision of particles which prevents you from walking through; it is a collision of forces. The atoms of our body: hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, calcium, zinc, iron, whatever, are the same as those in the wall; they are in tune, on the same frequency. They are mutually interactive. It is not possible to break the forces... or is it?

An electric current is nothing more than electron particles traveling along in the same direction, usually along a wire. These are the same very tiny particles that make of the key elements of every atom: they are the ones whose tremendously speedy revolutions around the atomic nucleus, and by their number and their speed, help to create the energy of each substance.

If I were to take 1,000,000 volts of high frequency electricity (at 60 cycles alternating current) and pass it through my body to ground there is no question I would look like Ramses’ mummy in short order. I would be instantly killed. The trillion, trillions, countless trillion and giga trillions of electrons would destroy my whole body. . . .Remember, 1 ampere measurement of electric energy is equal to 63.3 billion billion electrons per second at any given point of the current. That’s a lot of electrons in 1 million volts of high frequency electricity!

But change the frequency of that electricity. Change it to 65,000 cycles, and you can channel that 1 million volts through your body and out your fingertips like lightning . .. if metal thimbles are provided to allow a point of discharge. No? . . .Yes, very true.

The question was put to science long ago. In 1952, Dr. Irwin A. Moon, director of the Moody Institute of Science, demonstrated the reality of it, as have others. I use his example here since he was actually using it in terms of what we would today call a space warp.

The 1950s was full of such talk and examples, as we were entering the exciting age of the atom and all the new knowledge on the structure of the Universe it gave us. Unfortunately, we have forgotten the brilliant pioneers of that age. Today, we think of science only in terms of what monetary advantage its studies can give us.

But the world of science is the world of discovery and adventure. And it is this world which is giving firm foundation to such things as time and space warps.

Since Einstein said “Science is merely the refinement of everyday thinking,” Let’s consider for a moment the above example.

Did it dawn on you? The same particles that make up any wall (anything period), Dr. Moon channeled through his body. The electrons passed through harmlessly. . . though I don’t recommend anybody doing this test at home. What he did was merely to change the frequency.

The very same particles that are key to giving a wall its atomic stability passed freely through him. If we could change the frequency of the entire atom and not just the charged electron particle, what would be the potential? Could one not pass freely through a wall? What if there was another system of atoms that are not mutually interactive with ours? Could there not be another whole world? Like adjusting the position of a hologram card, would another whole scene emerge if you could manipulate electromagnetism and then the atom onto frequencies we have not yet discovered?

The work of John Hutchison makes one wonder what the potential in nature is, especially over the ocean, to create electromagnetic aberrations that may have frightening results.

One thing is common then to all the Universe: to all reality— electromagnetic energy. If Einstein was right, it would seem time and space —hence matter—are all connected. If a change over of space could be accomplished by electromagnetism, could the same be the pathway to Time?
 

Time Warp

All atoms are in vortex kinesis, as it was stated at the beginning. Therefore all matter is as some level of vortex kinesis. Since it is the nature of matter, anything that might cause a change in this intensity might bring about surprising changes indeed.

We already know that the great spinning orb of the Earth, and its great mass, affects time fractionally at the surface as compared to orbital heights. Time is slowed slightly. But what if we could increase the speed at which the Earth spun, fast enough to even bend space more before it? Could we then not slow time even more? It would seem so. But it is impossible to do that. The Earth is too great a mass for us to manipulate. But warping frequencies into a dangerous spinning vortex may not be as difficult.

A vortex may be the only way because it is spinning energy, an intensified example of the natural state of any matter.

Interestingly, like Elijah’s “fiery whirlwind,” could such a vortex bring about different progressions of time, different exchanges of space by changing the frequency of the atoms in the area? An energy vortex, like a magnetic vortex, would have unlimited potential on the wavelengths around this planet since it would disrupt them first. One would not have to waste time trying to bend them with a huge atomic mass like a planet.

One example of an energy vortex on the force fields of this Earth may come from the eye of a hurricane. Gravity anomalies have been reported recently. These should not surprise anyone considering the vast swirling energy of a hurricane is centered at its imploding vortex core.

But this is a massive atmospheric vortex, like a tornado. No one can get close enough without being obliterated (usually). How could anything experience a time or space anomaly before being destroyed?

Unlike all the atmospheric energy required to start and maintain a hurricane or tornado, magnetic vortices are the result of changes and shifts within the magnetic field of the Earth, deep within its mantel and core. These vortices are definitely believed to swirl into and out of existence within the body of the Earth.

The recent invention of Dr. Evgeny Podkletnov certainly underscores the potential of a natural magnetic vortex. His device was created at Tampere University Labs, Finland, in 1996. It was nothing more than a superconductor (12 inch diameter) sealed inside an outer metal casing filled with liquid nitrogen. The superconductor was set over three solenoids to magnetically levitate it and start it spinning. The liquid nitrogen in the outer casing was to keep it cool while this superconductor ring spun at several thousand RPM.

The phenomenal result was accidentally discovered. One of the assistants’ pipe smoke wafted over the device while it spun at 5,000 rpm. The smoke straight away went to the top of the room where it hovered. It was discovered that gravity had been slightly shielded over the device. In essence, a spinning magnetic field (vortex) affected the most mysterious force field of gravity. Dr. Podkletnov discovered via measurements that there was a funnel of less gravity 12 inches diameter above the machine going through each floor of the building and possibly then out into space. When spun to 25,000 rpm, the device took off on its own.

This alarming relationship of gravity to a spinning magnetic field opens the door for future discussions of time and space. Gravity is essential to everything, especially this subject. We are unaware of different time progressions because we all live within the same pull of gravity, cocooning the same progression of time. It is not possible to experience another progression of time or space independent of a field of gravity that is centric to it—in other words, goes with it. Gravity is essential. Gravity may be more than just bending space, but the exact curvature of key energy frequencies that become pulled into the area of the mass, like a planet, or are attracted to the great energy of all of its combined atoms.

In the above example of speeding cars, they can never go fast enough to bend space and slow time. The simple reason is they are within the Earth’s gravity. At those speeds any person inside would have to be removed from the seat with a putty knife. This is because the car is accelerating, not the people. They are pushed back by the force of acceleration because the Earth’s gravity is greater, and the Earth is not moving at the speeds of a machine going near light-speed.

But if these cars were in their own gravitational field, they could experience unlimited speed and another progression of time. If they could generate the energy to bend and disrupt all of our wavelengths, they may truly experience a very different world than ours.

Gravity is essential—both its creation and disruption. The Sun has gravity, but so does the Earth. Therefore, our tempo is set by the Earth’s pace, not the Sun’s. The Earth is a pocket of separate gravity than the Sun. To be independent of the Earth’s tempo, we must create a field independent of the Earth. So far, however, gravity has eluded us.

Gravity is more than simple attraction. It is orientation. With time, with space there must be gravity of some kind. Even the solar system is tempered by the heliosphere— the gravitational field of our sun. The “void of space” in our solar system is a lie. There are billions of wavelengths whose tempo may be set by the sun’s gravity, bent by planets, upset by several interactions, just like the mini solar system of the atom. It is interesting to note that when Pioneer 10, Pioneer 11 and Ulysses left the solar system, the last NASA could detect of them was “an incomprehensible acceleration.” They left the gravitational pull of the sun, and in the smooth ocean of wavelengths in intergalactic space they took off. How fast does light travel out there? How fast does time flow? One day we will know. But first we must understand all is energy. This is the blueprint to conquest and exploration. Nothing is impossible.

...If gravity is not a curvature of space only, then it is a force within mass. As such it too is tied up in the atom. It becomes the conduit which directs the force of energy. It reflects order, not chaos; it tempers the progression of all things. It orients all things towards itself.

What is the potential in a natural magnetic vortex to affect gravity, time and space? Have they really been discovered in the Triangle of Bermudas? Can they come from other sources? Is all this great power and spinning really needed to affect time, or have other, very week electromagnetic tests and warpings been done to show phenomenal things can be done just by interlocking electromagnetic fields, like in the Hutchison Effect?